How to Write a Review Paper | Few Tips To Write a Good Review Paper
The motivation behind a review paper is to concisely survey late advance in a specific point. In general, the paper condenses the present condition of information of the theme. It makes a deep understanding of the point for the reader by talking about the discoveries displayed in late research papers.
A review paper isn’t a “research project” or book report. It isn’t simply provide details regarding a few references you found. Rather, a review paper combines the outcomes from a few essential writing papers to create a sound contention about a theme or centered depiction of a field.
Researchers ordinarily utilize reviews to speak with each other and the overall population. You have to read a few unique research articles on a similar point and make your own decisions about the implications of those papers.
Most graduate students will need and benefit by writing a review paper on their subject matter
central to their thesis topic. Doing so will benefit you in writing introduction and discussion
sections of papers, help you ace your comprehensive exams, and most importantly, give you a
solid understanding of how your proposed research fits in to what the scientific community has
Your paper should include: A title and five general sections
Abstract: An abstract should be of approximately 200-300 words. Provide a brief summary of the review question being addressed or rationale for the review, the major studies reviewed, and conclusions drawn. Please do not cite references in the Abstract.
Introduction: Introduce the topic and your rationale for addressing this topic focusing on why this topic is important. Clearly define exactly what this article will discuss, outline the order in which you will discuss each subtopic to give the reader any background information needed to understand the coming sections.
Body (subtopics being addressed): Although the structure may vary based in the sub-topics or review questions being addresses. For example, if you are reviewing three different methodologies, you might divide the body of the article into three sections, each discussing one of the methods. In these sections, be sure to describe the research methods and evaluate how studies were conducted focusing on the study design and analysis e.g., intention to treat versus retention rate, compare studies, and discuss their implications.
Conclusions: You should develop the conclusion by briefly restating the rationale for your review and the purpose of the article, then discussing the conclusions you have drawn. You should also discuss the implications of your review findings and where you think research in this field should go from here.
Literature Cited: Use a standardized referencing system. A widely used one in the medical literature is the AMA style.